Course-aligned lesson expansion from original Day 29. This is not a practice-day cluster page.
Part 1 close | month repair review | 15-/30-minute paths
Review the Month 1 artifact chain, identify gaps before close, assign repairs, and decide what is safe to carry into the final monthly diagnostic.
Your manager says: “Before we close Month 1, show me what is actually ready, what is weak, and what must be repaired before D30.”
It sounds like a monthly progress summary. The trap is that D29 is a repair gate: D7, D14, D21, and D28 evidence must be checked before anything becomes a Month 1 claim.
“Month 1 built a complete AI workflow foundation with reusable prompts, deliverables, and portfolio evidence.”
The weak version contains complete foundation, reusable prompts, portfolio evidence, no weak item named, no repair owner.
D7 / D14 / D21 / D28 artifact used as proof.
What is missing, unsupported, or too vague?
Who fixes it before D30?
Include, repair first, or exclude.
Use this rule before filling the monthly table. The goal is a concrete handoff from accumulated evidence, not a polished empty summary.
D7 / D14 / D21 / D28 artifact used as proof.
What is missing, unsupported, or too vague?
Who fixes it before D30?
A manager asks whether Month 1 is ready to close. The worker must not simply say yes. They must identify weak or missing artifacts, repair priority, review status, and whether the item is safe for D30.
Find the real gaps before Month 1 is closed.
Do not turn the monthly review into a celebration note with no repair decisions.
D28 Boss/Foundation Production Pack / foundation-production-pack.md
D30 Monthly Diagnostic / Foundation Production Pack close
Learning checkpoint: Use the previous artifact as working input, produce today's artifact, and hand it forward with evidence, limitation, owner, and repair needs visible.
Review the Month 1 artifact chain, identify gaps before close, assign repairs, and decide what is safe to carry into the final monthly diagnostic.
Month 1 is not closed by celebrating progress. It closes by naming gaps, owners, repair actions, and whether D30 can safely include each item.
Month 1 is not closed by celebrating progress. It closes by naming gaps, owners, repair actions, and whether D30 can safely include each item.
Write one honest row: 'D26 README lacks limitation; worker adds use boundary before D30; exclude if not repaired.'
Write one honest row: 'D26 README lacks limitation; worker adds use boundary before D30; exclude if not repaired.'
A monthly or boss-facing page should expose the weakest usable item before it claims the strongest result. Mark repair, owner, and decision impact before export.
D7 use-case/risk map is manager-readable; D14 prompt library has reusable cases; D21 deliverable evidence lacks manager approval; D28 pack has README but weak limitation. Owner: support lead repairs D21 approval and D28 limitation before D30. D30 may include D7/D14, repair-first D21/D28, and exclude any unsupported portfolio claim.
D29 is not the final monthly answer. It is the board you use to decide what must be repaired before D30 is allowed to speak for Month 1.
Every row must connect one milestone artifact to a concrete gap, owner, repair action, and D30 include / repair / exclude decision.
Do not write “Month 1 went well.” Write which D7/D14/D21/D28 evidence is safe, weak, blocked, or excluded.
Before filling all rows, model one row as a paid-course receipt: concrete source, evidence, limitation, owner/review, and next action. Do not export rows that only repeat defaults.
Complete three repair-board rows: one safe-to-include item, one repair-first item, and one exclude-or-manager-decision item.
| No. | Milestone artifact / claim | Milestone source | Gap type | Review status | Repair owner | Repair action | D30 board decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||||||
| 2 | |||||||
| 3 |
Do not close Month 1 while important artifacts are missing, unsupported, or unclear.
Use this pass to find the monthly claim that would sound impressive but fail as evidence before export.
Weak row: D28 pack is complete and ready for D30.
Repair move: Attach prior artifact evidence, weakest gap, repair owner, and D30 include/exclude decision.
Better row: D7 use-case/risk map is manager-readable; D14 prompt library has reusable cases; D21 deliverable evidence lacks manager approval; D28 pack has README but weak limitation. Owner: support lead repairs D21 approval and D28 limitation before D30. D30 may include D7/D14, repair-first D21/D28, and exclude any unsupported portfolio claim.
Choose the claim you can defend with accumulated artifacts and evidence.
Choose the claim most likely to overstate progress or hide missing evidence.
Sentence starter: This monthly claim is weak because ___. I will repair it by adding ___ or excluding it from the handoff.
What this artifact proves: the learner can turn the page exercise into a manager-safe work receipt with evidence, limitation, owner/review, and next action visible.
Do not export as final if rows are blank, generic, stale, or missing a claim boundary.
This file is today’s work receipt. It should prove what Month 1 actually produced from accumulated artifacts, not just summarize progress.
What this artifact proves: This repair board proves which D7/D14/D21/D28 milestone claims are safe for D30, which require repair, and which must be excluded or escalated.
Weak export: D28 pack is complete and ready for D30.
Good export: D7 use-case/risk map is manager-readable; D14 prompt library has reusable cases; D21 deliverable evidence lacks manager approval; D28 pack has README but weak limitation. Owner: support lead repairs D21 approval and D28 limitation before D30. D30 may include D7/D14, repair-first D21/D28, and exclude any unsupported portfolio claim.
Click Generate Markdown to create month_1_gap_repair_plan.md.
D29 repairs gaps; D30 closes Part 1 and hands off to D31.