Course-aligned lesson expansion from original Day 58. Cluster: D52-D58 Template Testing / Revision. This page uses the previous and next artifacts to keep the practice connected.
Part 2 | D52-D58 Template Testing / Revision | manager synthesis
Synthesize D31-D57 into a context template library with evidence quality, reusable condition, repair action, and D59 readiness.
A manager wants a Context Template Library, not a pile of drafts. The library must select reusable candidates, show evidence quality, name repair needs, and prepare D59 review.
The trap is calling everything a library because many files exist. D58 must approve, hold, or repair candidates based on testing, stability, README, and capability evidence.
“The library is complete because all template artifacts are collected.”
The weak version contains complete, all template artifacts, no reusable condition, no D59 repair plan.
What is reusable enough to keep.
When it may be used.
Approve, repair, hold, or escalate.
Use this rule before filling the build table. The goal is tested, revised, documented template evidence that can become a managed library asset.
What is reusable enough to keep.
When it may be used.
Approve, repair, hold, or escalate.
A manager wants a Context Template Library, not a pile of drafts. The worker must select reusable templates, verify evidence quality, note repair needs, and decide what is ready for Part 2 close.
Synthesize D31-D57 into a context template library with evidence quality, reusable condition, repair action, and D59 readiness.
Calling a set of templates a library before testing evidence quality, reuse conditions, and repair needs.
A manager sees reusable templates, conditions, known weak points, repair queue, and D59 readiness. The library is a shelf with labels, not a pile of files.
Which shelf label protects reuse?
Received: D31-D57 context-template artifacts
Hands off: D59 Monthly Review / part2_gap_repair_plan.md
Redline: Do not add a template to the library unless evidence quality, reusable condition, repair status, and maintenance readiness are visible.
This page uses the previous and next artifacts to keep the practice connected.
Before building the artifact, decide what the template should make easier to review.
This sample is tied to Day 58: Boss: Context Template Library. This synthesis uses the D52-D57 evidence chain without exposing internal generation notes.
| No. | Previous day / upstream artifact | Library candidate / selected component | Evidence quality | Limitation / weak point | Reusable condition | Repair action | Manager decision | Maintenance / D59 readiness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | D31-D37 Context Template v1 | First context template v1 with task/context/review fields | Partial / needs repair | V1 lacks full input-output contract by itself | Reusable as historical seed only after D44 contract is attached | Keep as v1 reference; do not approve alone | Use internally only | Repair before D59 |
2 | D44 Input-Output Contract Pack | Required inputs, naming, output, format, failure repair, filled example | Strong / traceable | Tested mainly on renewal/escalation pattern | Reusable for evidence-backed manager summaries | Carry into library as contract layer | Approve library candidate | Ready for D59 with maintenance note |
3 | D51 Examples + Boundary Pack | Good/anti examples, few-shot boundaries, escalation, checklist | Strong / traceable | Needs testing across more input variation | Reusable as safety layer before template tests | Use as D52 test seed evidence | Approve library candidate | Ready for D59 with maintenance note |
4 | D52 Three-input Test Set | Normal/failure/boundary input coverage | Strong / traceable | Only three initial input types covered | Reusable as minimum stability test pattern | Add more test inputs during D59 if needed | Approve library candidate | Ready for D59 with maintenance note |
5 | D53 Failure Sample Log | Unsupported inference failure sample | Strong / traceable | Only one failure family logged so far | Reusable as failure-driven repair evidence | Add second failure type later | Repair first | Repair before D59 |
6 | D54 Context Template v2 Revision | V2 revision linked to unsupported inference failure | Partial / needs repair | Must be compared before library approval | Reusable only with D55 comparison evidence | Pair with D55 before D59 close | Repair first | Repair before D59 |
7 | D55 Stability Comparison | V1 vs V2 comparison on same boundary input | Strong / traceable | Remaining risk for ambiguous evidence notes | Reusable as stability proof for D56 README | Keep risk note in library README | Approve library candidate | Ready for D59 with maintenance note |
8 | D56 Template README + D57 Capability Note | README, maintenance note, and capability statement with limits | Strong / traceable | Capability limited to tested evidence-backed summaries | Reusable for manager handoff and D60 diagnostic | Keep limitation visible in D59/D60 | Approve library candidate | Ready for D59 with maintenance note |
The boss sees value and limits at the same time.
Manager update template
Reusable for internal weekly updates; weak point: customer-facing tone untested.
Core path: complete three rows. Deep path: complete three rows. Blank required fields create export warnings.
| No. | Previous day / upstream artifact | Library candidate / selected component | Evidence quality | Limitation / weak point | Reusable condition | Repair action | Manager decision | Maintenance / D59 readiness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||||
| 2 | ||||||||
| 3 |
Use this pass to find the row that would make a template look reusable without enough test evidence, failure repair, stability proof, README guidance, or library readiness.
Weak row: Library includes all templates from Part 2.
Repair move: Select candidates, cite evidence quality, name reusable condition, repair action, manager decision, and D59 readiness.
Better row: Approve v2 renewal-risk template only when current CRM source is present; hold audience-field variant for D59 repair.
Choose the row you would be comfortable carrying into the next day.
Choose the row most likely to fail before AI use.
Sentence starter: The weak row is weak because ___. I will repair it by adding ___ before using AI.
This file is today’s work receipt. It should show which tested template/library component can be reused tomorrow, not just that you filled a table.
What this artifact proves: This file proves the learner can synthesize Part 2 template work into a manager-decidable Context Template Library.
Weak export: Library includes all templates from Part 2.
Good export: Approve v2 renewal-risk template only when current CRM source is present; hold audience-field variant for D59 repair.
Click Generate Markdown to create context_template_library.md.
Continue with a day-specific practice example and handoff.