Part 2 close | separate monthly boundary page | monthly_diagnostic
Day 60: Part 2 Diagnostic + Part 3 Workflow/SOP Handoff
Diagnose Part 2 capability and export context_template_system_pack_and_part3_handoff.md.
3minimum rows
3 learner rows
8fields
1artifact
Deep path: improve the same 3 rows with stronger evidence, limits, and repair notes.
V1Scenario
Concrete workplace scenario
After D59, the manager asks for a concise diagnostic packet: what is reusable now, what remains limited, what maintenance rule protects it, and what D61 workflow/SOP work must inherit.
The trap is repeating the D59 repair board or celebrating Part 2. D60 must diagnose the repaired/limited system and hand Part 3 a workflow seed, not another gap list.
V2Worked answer before the table
Worked answer
Bad example first: the plausible shortcut fails
Weak example
“D59 listed the gaps, so Part 2 is complete and D61 can start workflows.”
What goes wrong
The weak version contains listed the gaps, complete, no maintenance rule, no workflow seed.
Work-ready version: use the day rule
Reusable system component
What is approved or limited-use now.
Diagnostic limit
What remains weak or conditional.
D61 workflow seed
What workflow/SOP requirement Part 3 inherits.
V3Decision fork
Quick decision check
D60 diagnoses the system and hands D61 workflow seeds
Use this rule before filling the build table. The goal is a decision-ready artifact, not a broad summary.
Reusable system component
What is approved or limited-use now.
Diagnostic limit
What remains weak or conditional.
D61 workflow seed
What workflow/SOP requirement Part 3 inherits.
TRACEToday’s workflow trace
Part 2 diagnostic and Part 3 handoff packet workflow trace
RESULTToday’s visible result
Before / after: what changed in your work?
Before learning
After learning
What AI-in-workflow means today
PACKETPart 3 workflow/SOP handoff packet
D60 diagnostic handoff to D61
D60 mirrors D30 as a diagnostic handoff, but the handoff target is different: D30 handed Part 2 a context seed; D60 hands Part 3 a workflow/SOP seed with reusable value, known limitation, maintenance rule, and stop condition.
Reusable now
Which template-system component is approved or limited-use?
Known limit
What maintenance rule or repair residue must stay visible?
D61 seed
Which workflow trigger, exception, or owner decision should Part 3 inherit?
Q1Boundary case
Workplace case
A manager needs a concise diagnostic: which context-template assets are reusable, what limits remain, what maintenance rules protect the system, and what Part 3 workflow/SOP work must inherit.
Main learning job
Diagnose Part 2 capability and export context_template_system_pack_and_part3_handoff.md.
Failure mode
Handing off to Part 3 without naming reusable context assets, limits, and workflow/SOP needs.
TRYMicro-practice
System pack handoff preview
The Part 2 system pack must say what the template system can do, where it is fragile, and what Part 3 workflow phase must test next.
Decision check
Which handoff claim is safest?
Your move
Q2Workload
Bounded monthly close standard
Workload bound
Summarize 3-5 reusable system components; do not turn the diagnostic into a full D31-D58 review.
Minimum acceptable completion
Complete at least 3 rows: core reusable system, strongest evidence proof, and Part 3 inherited workflow/SOP requirement. If evidence is weak, choose Repair first.
Dependency: D60 consumes D59 part2_gap_repair_plan.md and turns repaired/limited items into a Part 3 workflow/SOP handoff.
Q3Chain
Artifact handoff
Received: D59 part2_gap_repair_plan.md
Hands off: D61 What Is a Workflow? / workflow/SOP track handoff
Redline: Do not hand off to Part 3 without evidence artifact, known limitation, maintenance rule, and inherited workflow/SOP requirement.
Practice note: this diagnostic closes Part 2 and prepares the Part 3 Workflow/SOP requirement.
TRYDecision fork
Micro-practice: choose the safer next step
Before building the artifact, decide what the template should make easier to review.
PATHLearning checkpoint
Course path note
Use the previous artifact and the next handoff to keep this monthly review practical, honest, and ready for the workflow phase.
EXSample
Completed boundary-page sample row
This sample is day-specific for Day 60: Part 2 Diagnostic + Part 3 Workflow/SOP Handoff.
No.
System component
Previous artifact
Evidence proof
Reusable value
Known limitation
Maintenance rule
Part 3 inherited requirement
Manager decision
1
Context-template reuse system
D58 library + D59 gap repair plan
D58 rows show tested template components; D59 names weak evidence
Reusable evidence-backed template pack for manager summaries
Limited to tested evidence-backed summary cases; not universal automation
Keep failure logs, comparison tests, and README limitation notes updated
Convert approved context-template steps into D61 workflow/SOP track
Repair first
No. 1
System component
Context-template reuse system
Previous artifact
D58 library + D59 gap repair plan
Evidence proof
D58 rows show tested template components; D59 names weak evidence
Reusable value
Reusable evidence-backed template pack for manager summaries
Known limitation
Limited to tested evidence-backed summary cases; not universal automation
Maintenance rule
Keep failure logs, comparison tests, and README limitation notes updated
Part 3 inherited requirement
Convert approved context-template steps into D61 workflow/SOP track
Manager decision
Repair first
EXWorked answer
Worked answer example before you build
The handoff is useful because it is honest about limits.
Handoff area
Template system readiness
Preview line
Can draft internal manager updates; fragile with customer-facing claims; Part 3 must test workflow confirmation points.
3-row acceptable completion example: one reusable system component, one evidence proof with limitation, and one Part 3 inherited workflow/SOP requirement.
No.
System component
Previous artifact
Evidence proof
Reusable value
Known limitation
Maintenance rule
Part 3 inherited requirement
Manager decision
1
2
3
Q5Summary
Summary / decision
Q6Handoff
Downstream handoff candidate
V5Repair pass
Repair one weak row
Use this pass to find the row that would make the artifact look ready while hiding evidence gaps, unclear owner decision, missing exception, or weak handoff.
Repair example
Weak row: Part 2 is complete after D59 repairs.
Repair move: Diagnose reusable value, known limitation, maintenance rule, and D61 workflow/SOP requirement.
Better row: System component: limited-use renewal-risk template; limit: CRM evidence only; maintenance: source freshness check; D61 seed: workflow trigger for stale source escalation.
Choose the row you would be comfortable carrying into the next day.
Choose the row most likely to fail before AI use.
Sentence starter: The weak row is weak because ___. I will repair it by adding ___ before using AI.
QXExport artifact
Export artifact
This file is today’s work receipt. It should show the exact decision or handoff that the next day can use, not just that you filled a table.
Before you export
Does the export function as a D60 diagnostic + Part 3 handoff packet, not another D59 gap list?
Does each row name reusable value, known limitation, maintenance rule, and D61 workflow/SOP requirement?
Would D61 know which workflow seed and stop rule to inherit?
What this artifact proves: This file proves the learner can convert D59 repairs into a Part 2 diagnostic and D61 workflow/SOP handoff packet.
Weak export: Part 2 is complete after D59 repairs.
Good export: System component: limited-use renewal-risk template; limit: CRM evidence only; maintenance: source freshness check; D61 seed: workflow trigger for stale source escalation.
Click Generate Markdown to create context_template_system_pack_and_part3_handoff.md.
Part 2 close
D59-D60 Part 2 close / Part 3 handoff standard
Continue with a separate Part 2 close / Part 3 handoff practice path.